5 reasons to dump commercially perverse Google search for DuckDuckGo
You have options.
After Google, Bing holds second place with a 7.02 percent share, Yahoo! is number three with a share of 3.38 percent and Ecosia (0.12 percent).
Unlike Google, which is mired in privacy issues, the DuckDuckGo search engine is all about privacy. Google is known for collecting, tracking, storing and monitoring user data.
If these and Targeted advertising make you sick, DuckDuckGo is an alternative. Here are five reasons to dump the commercially perverse Google search for DuckDuckGo.
It works a lot like Google, but it doesn’t follow you
James Temperton from Wired used DuckDuckGo for two years and wrote about the experience, saying it sold him “to a post-Google future.”
DuckDuckGo works pretty much the same as any other search engine. It combines data from hundreds of sources, including Wikipedia, Bing, and Wolfram Alpha, with its own web crawler, to give you the most relevant results, Temperton wrote. Google is doing the exact same thing on a larger scale.
The main difference, he said, is that DuckDuckGo does not store IP addresses or user information and does not track you.
DuckDuckGo has 78 employees and Google 114,096, “but often the result is the same,” Temperton wrote. “It turns out that for the majority of your research, David is as good as Goliath.”
With DuckDuckGo, you are the seeker, not the wanted
An independent search engine designed from A to Z to with your privacy in mind, DuckDuckGo does not collect information about you, collect your search queries, or install cookies or tracking code on your systems.
This too provides accurate maps thanks to an agreement with Apple that allows it to use the privately designed Apple Maps service, Jonny Evans wrote with Computer world. DuckDuckGo uses Apple’s MapKit JS framework, created by Apple for website owners to embed maps into their sites.
Google manipulates search results in favor of big business
A 2019 the Wall Street newspaper The investigation found that Google manipulated search algorithms to prioritize large companies over smaller ones, removing autocomplete results that involve sensitive topics such as immigration and abortion, and even blacklisted some websites.
Guiding users to larger businesses than lesser-known businesses would have helped boost Amazon’s store in search results. Autocomplete search results for sensitive topics have been replaced with more secure results than those found on competing search engines such as DuckDuckGo, Yahoo and Bing, Business Insider reported.
Google has increasingly redesigned and interfered with search results, according to the Journal – often in response to pressure from businesses, outside interest groups and governments around the world.
“They have risen sharply since the 2016 election and the rise of online disinformation… Google’s evolutionary approach marks the shift from its founding philosophy of ‘organizing global information’ to a much more active philosophy of deciding how this information must appear. “
DuckDuckGo isn’t constantly trying to sell you something
Considered the search engine that doesn’t follow you, DuckDuckGo processes roughly 1.5 billion searches per month, Wired reported. In contrast, Google processes around 3.5 billion searches per day – it’s not a fair fight, but DuckDuckGo is growing. In 2012, he performed an average of 45 million searches per month. “The real difference in the results you see when you search isn’t that far away,” Temperton reported.
Listen to GHOGH with Jamarlin Martin | Episode 73: Jamarlin martin Jamarlin explains why this is a multifactorial rebellion over the protests against George Floyd. He discusses the Democratic Party’s underhanded relationship with police in cities and dem-controlled states, and why Joe Biden is a cop and the Steve Jobs of mass incarceration.
“In fact, in a lot of ways, DuckDuckGo is better. Its search results aren’t filled with Google products and services – boxes and carousels trying to persuade people to spend more time in Google’s family of apps. “
There is a lot of talk about Apple buying DuckDuckGo
Buying the DuckDuckGo search engine and making it the default search engine on iOS and Mac Apple could cost Google around $ 15 billion a year, Forbes reported.
“Apple has always loved vertical integration: owning the complete solution stack for customers,” according to Forbes.
There are a few potential benefits for Apple to buy DuckDuckGo. Both are very privacy-focused. Google, by comparison, is constantly targeted in privacy lawsuits and lawsuits. In the United States, Google faces $ 5 billion class action for allegedly illegally invading the privacy of millions of users by tracking their internet usage through browsers defined in “private” mode.