Sabah's Revenue Battle: A Fight for Constitutional Rights!
The call for Sabah's rightful 40% revenue return is gaining momentum, but the path to achieving it is a contentious one. Former Chief Minister Salleh Said Keruak argues that this crucial decision-making process should be brought to the forefront of the state assembly's agenda. But why is this issue so significant?
The Background:
Sabah, a state in Malaysia, has been embroiled in a legal battle for its fair share of revenue. The Kota Kinabalu High Court ruled in October 2025 that the federal government had unlawfully neglected Sabah's 40% revenue entitlement for almost five decades. This decision came after the Sabah Law Society (SLS) filed a judicial review in 2022, alleging a breach of the Federal Constitution.
The Controversy:
In a bold statement, Salleh insists that the state assembly must be involved in the final decision-making process. He emphasizes the need for transparency and a clear timeline to avoid any perception of stalling tactics. But here's where it gets controversial: the current Chief Minister, Hajiji Noor, disagrees. Hajiji believes that the matter can be resolved without the assembly's input, and calls for patience in determining the distribution formula.
The Negotiation Process:
Salleh, also the state Umno treasurer, suggests that the negotiation process should not be limited to administrative channels. He advocates for the inclusion of the SLS, given their pivotal role in the court case. This proposal raises questions about the ideal balance between legal expertise and political representation in such negotiations.
The Public's Role:
With the matter affecting Sabah's constitutional rights, public sentiment is a crucial factor. Salleh's emphasis on transparency and the involvement of elected representatives could be seen as a way to ensure public trust. But is this enough to satisfy the people's demands for justice?
As the negotiations progress, the question remains: Will Sabah's 40% revenue return be achieved through a collaborative effort, or will it continue to be a subject of debate and legal battles?
What do you think is the best way forward for Sabah's revenue battle? Should the state assembly have the final say, or are there other avenues to ensure a fair outcome? Share your thoughts and let's spark a discussion on this important issue!
